| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Industrial Content - Mining Charters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TheSkeptic wrote: Additionally you've still failed to provide a mechanism for someone to challenge your claim. If you claim a belt, it should be possible for someone to dispute & try to forcefully remove you and your claim should they wish...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2013.05.13 08:03:00
|
2. Industrial Content - Mining Charters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TheSkeptic wrote: Kai'rae Saarkus wrote: ...stuff... You're missing my point. It's hi-sec... the resources available should never be claimable by an entity. This is why pocos are NPC owned, moon minerals cannot be mined, ore, ice belts ...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2013.05.11 14:21:00
|
3. Industrial Content - Mining Charters - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TheSkeptic wrote: Because comments like this... Andrea Griffin wrote: I like this idea as well. My only concern is that people looking for easy kills will attack the structure for the sake of shooting people instead of control over the res...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2013.05.11 04:41:00
|
4. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I want to buff the ships; the fact that almost all viable fits for them include an MWD means that cap is almost always an issue. But I want to do it in a way that buffs the ships generally, not the MWD-fits specifically. And a 10% base cap incre...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.09 23:28:00
|
5. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It you make it so that an AB Attack Cruiser was never considered. Buffing the base Cap by 10% or so would have much the same effect (better Cap stability / mitigate fitting an MWD) but would benefit AB fit ships as much as MWD fit ones.
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.09 22:39:00
|
6. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Little Dragon Khamez wrote: Bouh Revetoile wrote: Little Dragon Khamez wrote: My secondary point is that the missile is supposed to be the 'weapon of choice' of the caldari, but it isn't as the stats show most caldari pilots firing rails,...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.09 06:05:00
|
7. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sheynan wrote: To be fair one of those -75% damps is already enough to **** with about any kiting/sniping/med-range ship. One Celestis could for example shut down 4 Rokhs, fitted like they are currently used in 0.0. (From 146km to 36km, which...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.09 05:57:00
|
8. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
serras bang wrote: Jorma Morkkis wrote: Faora Zod wrote: Daichi Yamato wrote: glad to see we've all moved on Yeah it is nice to see people bitching about who has the better ships now since there has not been an update or change to t...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.08 08:41:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Only rational integers need apply 4.5 is a rational integer. So what happens in that case? On the other hand, if he has 4.49% complete, it's an irrational number and he obviously gets nothing at all. Right? http://www....
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.08 08:30:00
|
10. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
What, an Amarr ship can work with only 3 mids.. who knew?
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.08 08:23:00
|
11. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
That Kiting Rax fit will run into Cap issues faster than the Stabber. Against a target going 2400 M/s Hammers won't do any damage, and Valks will do barely any. Max DPS will be achieved by Hobos. You're also comparing it against a bad Stabber f...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.08 08:10:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev Blog: Back to the balancing future! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Destination SkillQueue wrote: Forlorn Wongraven wrote: I don't get how people always assume that large fleets never have T3 links as well. It's because they want to protect their advantage, but know they can't really justify that position...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.07 10:19:00
|
13. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Keko Khaan wrote: Theres alot awesome gallente boats.. Let me name some of them for you.. Lachesis Arazu Proteus (small gang) Oneiros Ares Taranis Keres Nemesis Enyo Ishkur Phobos Deimos (small gang) Ishtar (pve) Talos Myrmidon (bait/solo tri...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.06 11:11:00
|
14. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: fukier wrote: though i do agree something needs to be done about on grid warping... I vote frigates and destroyers can make warps as short as 100km, and battleships can't warp less than 200km, and capital ships can...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.06 08:42:00
|
15. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@Alara. Well at least we agree on the problem: 800mm Plates. Now, if only you come around to my way of thinking we'll agree on the solution. Increasing the Grid of 1600mm Plates to 1000 only serves to homogenize armour tanking : all BSs fit 160...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.06 07:56:00
|
16. Torp Range Nerf???? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Karina Mendoc Kuget wrote: Kai'rae Saarkus wrote: Edit: I'd also suggest checking out this - https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=168820 - thread for the TP changes. Which will also Buff Torps. Maybe I did miss somet...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.06 07:39:00
|
17. Proposal "Anchorable Monuments" - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I think you mean 'purely symbolic' rather than pointless. But that's probably a distinction without a difference.
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.04 12:45:00
|
18. Torp Range Nerf???? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Karina Mendoc Kuget wrote: Kai'rae Saarkus wrote: At level 4 GMP you should be getting better damage on Duality than on TQ for a slight range nerf. *Erudite numbers about how Rage missiles are **** at applying DPS. Wow, you missed the...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.04 12:32:00
|
19. Sticky:[Winter] Disruption Frigate Rebalance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@ Fozzie. Is there any reason why the Crucifier doesn't have Launchers? I've been playing around with the Crucifier, and have only found viable fits with Projectiles fitted in it's highs. A Rocket Crucifier would work really well and be very A...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.04 05:36:00
|
20. Sticky:[Winter] Ewar Tweaks for Retribution - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
fukier wrote: Gneeznow wrote: Mortimer Civeri wrote: Damps will still be useless. Damps are good now, they'll be even better after the ship changes and damp changes. A celestis can shut down two snipers like tier 3 battlecruisers at 10...
- by Kai'rae Saarkus - at 2012.11.04 04:28:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |